The Good Company: Then and Now
Since the rise of the modern corporation, in the late 19th century, America has
subjected the question of what a good
company is — or ought to be — to near-constant debate.
The titans of American
industry view the good company as part of an enlightened
oligopoly, favoring cooperation over socially destabilizing
competition.
Paternalistic corporations
oversee their workers' health and moral improvement in company
towns like Bisbee, Arizona, and Pullman, Illinois.
1906.
Upton Sinclair publishes his exposé of bad corporate practices, The Jungle,
provoking stricter food safety regulations but no improvement
in working conditions.
1913.
J.C. Penney introduces a code of conduct that urges employees "to serve
the public, as nearly as we can, to its complete satisfaction."
1914.
Henry Ford's "Five Dollar Day" dramatically increases paychecks, promising
to turn workers into consumers.
At many large companies, mild
profit-sharing and stock-ownership plans discourage unions and
unrest.
Faced with a deep and
long-lasting crisis, the public expects the government to ensure good
corporate behavior.
1933.The
New Deal restrains price competition, regulates banking, and forces
companies to negotiate with unions. Most businesspeople oppose these popular
measures.
1935.
Congressional investigations reveal that on the eve of the Depression, executive
pay ran high, igniting debates over how profits should be
shared among investors, business leaders, and
employees.
Supporting the war
effort is seen as a duty—or at least as smart PR. Good companies limit
profits on the matériel they supply to the government.
Technical innovation
and creativity, crucial to military production, are important criteria
in the public's definition of a good company.
When stability returns,
employment is idealized as a compact between worker and
employer: loyalty in exchange for a job for life.
http://digital.library.northwestern.edu/wwii-posters/img/ww1645-89.jpg
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
Good companies make good
products: appliances, cars, and other conveniences that improve the lives of the
burgeoning middle class.
1955.
For businesspeople, big becomes shorthand for good. The first
Fortune 500 index of the largest companies appears, with General Motors at the
top.
Even advertising is seen as
playing a positive social role. By making people want more and better
things, the argument goes, ads raise the standard of
living.
1964.
The Civil Rights Act passes, and lack of discrimination becomes the new
ethical bar that companies must clear. A year later the first black
director joins a major company board.
1965.
Ralph Nader's Unsafe at Any Speed exposes disregard for safety concerns
at car companies, raising consumer awareness. Product safety
emerges as a new standard of goodness.
As companies struggle to
survive "stagflation," efficiency becomes a mark of
goodness.
1978.
The Airline Deregulation Act introduces competition to an
inefficient industry. Major airlines, unions, and safety advocates all oppose
the act, but consumers like the prospect of lower fares.
Encouraged by the success of
Japanese imports—and by Peter Drucker—good companies emulate Japan's
quality-obsessed industrial practices.
Under pressure from global
competition, business leaders focus increasingly on a single measure of
goodness: shareholder value.
1981.
President Reagan's firing of striking air traffic controllers, combined with
widespread corporate layoffs, leads to a dramatic falloff in union influence
over companies.
1983.
Fortune publishes its first list of "America's Most Admired
Companies," based on a survey of business leaders. The tech and
pharmaceutical industries dominate the top 10.
The idea of corporate
social responsibility, which has been stuck in academia for 40 years,
goes mainstream. Now good companies create CSR departments.
Silicon Valley's success
redefines the best companies as the most innovative. Intel and
3M draw envy for disrupting their industries.
1997.
The public's rising awareness of sweatshop labor and environmental damage pushes
corporations like Nike to keep a closer eye on their global supply
chains.
In a decade bookended by burst
bubbles, corporate reputations suffer as the public directs its anger at
corruption and executive pay.
Social entrepreneurs and
multinationals see opportunities to make money by finding innovative
ways to solve problems in the developing world.
Companies from GE to Walmart
redefine their missions to include producing social as well as economic
value.